I am perfectly imperfect human and I love it.

The way I write is not perfect and that is the beauty we shall respect. That is the only beauty future will respect. Perfect Human Imperfection.

The most important part of my writing is that ideas and the writing itself just came from my mind and each letter was written by me. Not Ai, not some other guy I am referencing. Even though I am academically educated and have been a part of high and prestigious education, I believe academic writing and Ai have many things in common. And that unfortunately means the end of respect for academic education. Both writings are not free. When I say free, that means that they follow the same rules. The world is already seeing that academic education is losing its power and that’s because Ai is gaining power, not that these two things are closely connected, but they depend on each other in such scenario.

A. Firstly, getting a job by going to university and by being educated is almost not achievable today, while people that entertain and do not educate themselves in traditional ways are getting more opportunities and earn more money. Anyone dancing on social media that dedicated 5 years to dance and build their social media accounts will always earn more money than any university educated person that simply applies for a job with their CV. This shift in values is the first reason.

B. The second reason is that rules university education sets are the same rules Ai has in its training and academic thought is getting easier and easier replicated. What Ai is not able to replace is the freedom of the human mind. The only text that will be respected in just a few years is the text that comes freely through human mind and proposes new ideas. Ai is generating from already existing content. Academic education teaches you how to generate from already existing content. I never liked that, I never found myself there and that’s why I couldn’t defend my Master Thesis at Malmo University. I did everything the program required, but then when I thought that I can express myself in my Thesis, I faced with harsh truth. Education does not want really want that. They expect you to be human AI. This is not what a thinker wants, this is not what this world needs, but to this day, education is forcing you to become the prompt for the cycle of never-ending money chase. Because why is education there in the first place? To create people who are capable of generating wealth. There is no other purpose. Making people smarter? Not really. Regarding my Masters, I wanted to introduce new ideas and new ways of observing and analysing reality, but I couldn’t because nobody in the past said the thing I wanted to say and I could not reference anyone. And why do I have to reference anyone? Why everyone born before me is praised more than me? Whatever I wrote came from my mind, but that’s not enough, because we do not have record of some other mind before me saying similar things. References. References are what we call an AI Training today. Original thought is danger.

C. The third reason is that standard education has not been updated in so many years and simply it doesn’t follow the progress of the world. System is not working properly for so long and this is probably the end of it. If anyone can prompt to create text from the same references, why would anyone create a text from references? And lets be clear, I am not against academic education or references, literature, culture, but I am against being less than ChatGPT in few years when following current university standard. I think we all should be educated, smart, intelligent bookworms that get dressed nicely to go out to enjoy Tchaikovsky. But how the world currently looks like, education is failing us while AI is admired as salvation. We are thought in capitalism that we are easily replaceable and many believe that, but that’s not the truth.

We humans are capable of creating original ideas. Ai is not. We humans should be embraced to have freedom of expression. Freedom in this case observed conditionally, of course. In my last article I touched on a subject of Artificial Intelligence, so I wanted to write more about the subject, because I have experience with AI, I worked with AI, I believe in Ai as a powerful tool and I am capable of dealing with it. We all have to learn about AI and what are the opportunities and skills we need for the future. I encourage everyone to explore AI, because this is our reality and skills in AI are necessary, but it doesn’t mean AI is our salvation. AI is our frenemy at the best. We have to ask ourselves if the AI presents the end goal of technology development or not.

When we say AI, mostly we are still having this glamours image of progress, but is AI actually progress? People usually say that AI now is just like some new software that appeared 20 years ago. That’s most definitely not true, since software till AI was there to help humans express themselves, while Ai is there capable of replacing human expression (in a limited and recycled way). And this is not sci-fi. Ai is already replacing humans in their workplaces. Google it.

AI is a tool and this is how we should use it, not to limit ourselves, but to free ourselves. If we decide to use Ai to generate ideas instead of us, what is the point of us? To feed more Ai? Probably all of us reading this article are older than 18, so our mind still got a chance to develop. What about the newborns in 5 years? How are these adults going to look like if they do not need to use their brain to generate anything original? Dangerous future.

I am assuming that textual content and non-digital media will become more and more produced and consumed.

A. Firstly, because Law of Contrast declares the end of dependency on visual content, while rebellious acts of reading will be celebrated. Not because people want to read or that they have time for it, but because this keeps human segment to their existence. Visual content is fast, easily generated, realistic, while books are keeping the core of humanity and expanding the Mind. The same with arts and crafts. Not that there will be an emphasis on what is real, but what is worth the attention. If humanity continues like this, we are just pure walking shells. This is where curation is born. Curation of no-scroll content and activities is what becomes luxurious. This is where privacy from my previous article comes into place. Your life is curated. Your life is private, not shared with everyone. And this privacy is based on the curation of specific interest. Lifestyle is dead. Curation becomes the lifestyle.

B. How AI works is based on prompt and prompt is mostly textual information. So, in order to generate proper results, people would need to expand their usage of language. That’s ideal scenario. However, the language and ability to express will die, since prompts do not expand the language, but limit it’s usage in very specific ways in order to get the result. During pandemic, many small children that were learning to talk did not develop properly, since they heard the sound, but did not see the mouth moving. This sound displacement is affecting future generations in their expression and their ability to properly communicate, so video with sound can not maintain to be the main content. Today’s videos will be something like movies or TV Shows today. They exists, they are produced with a better quality, but their low quality core and oversaturation make them pointless. Since they are not natural expression, but fake reality. Again. The only remaining thing that is left is expression in text or in arts and crafts. Thats why we see textures in the fashion industry and return of traditional. For example, it is not because someone likes lace, but because lace is an unconscious rebellious act against society (in particular moments, everything is dependent on the context, of course).

I am trying not to keep these articles too long.

Thank you.